#blr_p : I know that you have a knack for posting comments and counter comments and arguing with people for any length of time... Well, here's news: I don't give a damn for what you think.
Look kid, i asked you to present your evidence. I've not even begun to argue with you as yet.
I posted a view which was substantiated by another member #avi by giving an example. Now, if you are so keen on typing lengthy passages and improving your English, please find sumone else!.
Did not explain what 'embarassing info' was.
And the fact that you do not know how the sections and acts I mentioned are being misused clearly indicates your lack of general knowledge. I would suggest you start reading up on a good national daily.
Links to articles ?
Ohh... And BTW, the last time I argued with a member in GT, that member got banned for a week. Not to mention that our relationship got sour forever. It's in our best interest to try and avoid anything like that.
So, as you cannot stop me from posting anything that I want and as I am not at all interesting in proving any of my points to you, let's just keep our views about each other to ourselves! I sincerely hope we do not have to quote each other again...
Haha, simple questions asked and we got some whining in return.
Forums i'm on if you make statements then you're required to back them up whenever challenged.
Otherwise its you that gets banned, suspended or whatever. If i was a mod here thats how i would do it. This saves on a lot of worthless opinions that have no basis. In short it leads to a much more informative discussion.
yes, you are required to back your stuff up, not the other way around If you start arguing and tap dancing around this requirement then its obvious you cannot do it. In which case what is your opinoin worth ? nothing.
We are not talking about how many sugars you take with your coffee.
For a law student this should be obvious, if you ever have any hopes of successfully arguing a case in the future.
Whereas here, all we see is you telling us you are some law student, but whose knowledge does not come across much at all. Its like you just parroted something from a book without even understanding what the basis for it was. Its very obvious you never did any research on this at all.
An opinion by itself is worth nothing.
A qualified opinion is better
Best of al is one that can withstand challenges.
This is how i tell whether people know what they are talking about regardless of whatever purported titles they hold.