cool_cat
Adept
KDE: It’s time for a fork
June 28th, 2008 ·
OK, I’ve now tried KDE 4.1. I’d been assured that it would be better than KDE 4.0x. It is. That’s the good news. The bad news is that I still find KDE 4.1 to be inferior to KDE 3.5x.
KDE’s developers believe that KDE 4.1 “can fully replace KDE 3 for end users.†I don’t see it.
There are some fundamental changes for the better. Qt4, the cross-platform application framework, which underlies KDE 4 takes up less memory and should result in faster performance. I haven’t seen the promised performance benefits, but then KDE 4.1 is still in beta, whatever ‘beta’ means. So, in this settingâ€â€Kubuntu 8.04 and openSUSE 11 on Intel dual-core systems with two gigabytes of RAMâ€â€I’ll let KDE 4.1’s poor performance go by without additional comment.
My real problems with KDE 4.1 is far more fundamental. The developers believe that they have a better way of handling the desktop. For them, I’m sure they do. For users, this user anyway, the new desktop fails at a desktop’s main job: enabling the user to get their work done as easily as possible.
read the article fully @ :
KDE: It’s time for a fork