NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT AGP 128MB (500/900MHz)
ATI RADEON 9800 PRO 128MB (380/680MHz)
1)-1024*768
2)-1280*1024
3)-1600*1200
a-aa and af
At most times it should be calculated as diff of higher-lower/lower * 100 and after about 60fps might not feel performance increase but that increase will still be noted.
t-No noticeble playable performance diff(5-10% as I have taken)
p-performance diff
COD:United offensive
1)t 1)a,p,6600gt wins
2)t 2)a,p,r9800pro wins
3)t 3)a,p,radeon 9800pro wins
doom3,
i think it is assumed that radeon 9800pro falls way back
ut04
1)r9800pro wins
2)t
3)6600gt wins
1a)t
2a)6600gt wins
3a)t
second ut04 benchmark not posted in the forum
halo:combat evolved
1)gt
2)gt
3)gt
far cry
1)t
2)t
3)gt
1a)t
2a)t
3a)t
source
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/2004-27gpu2.html
but best would be to see real figures.
chekc the source
ATI RADEON 9800 PRO 128MB (380/680MHz)
1)-1024*768
2)-1280*1024
3)-1600*1200
a-aa and af
At most times it should be calculated as diff of higher-lower/lower * 100 and after about 60fps might not feel performance increase but that increase will still be noted.
t-No noticeble playable performance diff(5-10% as I have taken)
p-performance diff
COD:United offensive
1)t 1)a,p,6600gt wins
2)t 2)a,p,r9800pro wins
3)t 3)a,p,radeon 9800pro wins
doom3,
i think it is assumed that radeon 9800pro falls way back
ut04
1)r9800pro wins
2)t
3)6600gt wins
1a)t
2a)6600gt wins
3a)t
second ut04 benchmark not posted in the forum
halo:combat evolved
1)gt
2)gt
3)gt
far cry
1)t
2)t
3)gt
1a)t
2a)t
3a)t
source
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/2004-27gpu2.html
but best would be to see real figures.
chekc the source