ASUS VivoBook Flip 14 (2021), 14-inch (35.56 cm) FHD Touch, Intel Core i3-1115G4 11th Gen, 2-in-1 Laptop (8GB/512GB SSD/Office 2021/Windows 11/Integrated Graphics/Black/1.5 kg), TP470EA-EC312WS
https://amzn.eu/d/fHjiyT3
I think I've checked this one out before, and if I remember correctly it has a poor display, something like ~60% sRGB color gamut coverage, meaning it'll likely look quite dull and lifeless, not to mention inaccurate (though that's a different metric altogether). For context, most decent phones these days come with >95% sRGB displays and decent accuracy (once you turn off the "Vivid" mode). IMO, 90% sRGB coverage is the bare minimum you should accept if you care about viewing quality at all. If the laptop in question has a good value for this spec, they often put it in the product description on e-commerce sites, and a lot of manufacturers put the value (good or bad) in the detailed specifications for that particular machine on their website.
Having good gamut coverage doesn't guarantee that it'll be a good or accurate display, but like I said, it's a minimum - if you want to go the extra mile and get something accurate as well, you'll have to check out individual reviews for the average ΔE (delta E) values: <2 is generally considered professional grade, 2-4 is good for consumers, >6 is usually considered poor. Getting this information is a lot harder though, since measuring color gamut and accuracy requires equipment that costs a couple hundred dollars (at least), and a lot of review sites either don't bother with it or can't afford it. This is especially problematic since there are some models that are popular only in developing countries like India, where almost no one makes those measurements, and to make matters worse, sometimes the reviews that come up are for a different SKU from a different region with different components than what's available to you locally. This difficulty is why I generally just tell people to look for color gamut coverage (a spec that's easier to find) and be done with it.
P.S. Some manufacturers have started listing NTSC color gamut coverage instead of or in addition to sRGB, the former being the US standard for broadcast television and the latter being the standard for most content on the web and basically anything you do on a computer, so that's the only one you really have to worry about. While they're not directly comparable, 72% NTSC
usually corresponds to >96% sRGB coverage, so that's your benchmark. A lot of subpar screens with <65% sRGB will be advertised as 45% NTSC, so you should avoid those.
