^^ Regardless of the political intent, he does have a point. The police is quick to register a case against snapdeal top brass, but are we forgetting that snapdeal is primarily a marketplace for sellers? I don't see anything about the action taken against the actual sellers and suppliers. I understand that snapdeal may be selling the stuff through its own retailer, but the question in that case is what about the suppliers and is the brass same for that in house retailer. For instance WS Retail on Flipkart is a separate entity from Flipkart. If the actual suppliers and sellers are being left alone in this case, then I can only conclude that FDA is doing somebody else's bidding.
Furthermore, I don't like this trend of cases being registered and action being taken against CEO's and other top executives. Maybe in some cases, negligence can be pinned down onto to the top brass of a company and appropriately cases registered, but in many cases, its not the case. Maybe in this case, there is enough justification if they are the people who signed the deal with the suppliers.
Still, when uber incident came into the limelight, the police was looking at the possibility of booking the Uber executives in India as co-conspirators for the rape just in order to cover their own fault of handing out police verification certificates in return for bribes. This is a really new bad trend that is emerging. Harass the top executives when ever some worker of theirs misbehaves. If this is justified, then I would like the same to be applied to political parties as well. Lets there be cases against a parties top brass like Modi, Sonia/Rahul, AK whenever their party workers indulge in violence or vandalism. If a govt employee commits a crime, then the respective CM and PM at the time should be booked a co conspirators to the crime.