Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Need Buying Help?
Gadgets & Consumer Electronics Buying Advice
Mid-range LCDs demystified
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="..:: Free Radical ::.." data-source="post: 673542" data-attributes="member: 4726"><p>While I do agree that the eye can resolve much more detail than the current generation displays, please bear in mind that the figures you quoted are <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In context to printed images (<a href="http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html" target="_blank">Clarkvision)</a>. Printers preserve the most detail when they are used to print at the highest possible dpi.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Subject to bias by the photographer. Not everyone has the same visual acuity. I hardly call that a blind test and I am no stranger to medical research as I have been a part of quite a few.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The "maximum" detail is perceived not with the eye at rest, but by accomodating the lens of the eye i.e. squinting which fatigues the eye and can cause eye strain or worse. For something like a monitor which depending on your job, you have to watch for hours, you'll want something which requires minimal effort.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Not everyone sits at 20 inches to view a monitor or watch HD movies.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I am all for high resolution monitors for the masses if they don't compromise on anything else <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>If its a trade off between the screen real estate and "super high resolutions", I would prefer more screen real estate.</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I would love to see a 23" 16:9 1080p IPS "for the masses" as soon as possible. God, I so wish there was one so that I won't even have to make this review.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your powerful graphic card won't be powerful long enough as is the current trend with GPU hardware. Your monitor will outlive your GPU. Why not buy something which would serve you better for the long term?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good for you! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>My only aim is to help those who are in need of a new monitor. You can buy what you want and justify your purchases later <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" />hyeah:</p><p></p><p>I am just finding justifications for a monitor I am yet to buy. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="..:: Free Radical ::.., post: 673542, member: 4726"] While I do agree that the eye can resolve much more detail than the current generation displays, please bear in mind that the figures you quoted are[LIST] [*]In context to printed images ([URL="http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html"]Clarkvision)[/URL]. Printers preserve the most detail when they are used to print at the highest possible dpi. [*]Subject to bias by the photographer. Not everyone has the same visual acuity. I hardly call that a blind test and I am no stranger to medical research as I have been a part of quite a few. [*]The "maximum" detail is perceived not with the eye at rest, but by accomodating the lens of the eye i.e. squinting which fatigues the eye and can cause eye strain or worse. For something like a monitor which depending on your job, you have to watch for hours, you'll want something which requires minimal effort. [*]Not everyone sits at 20 inches to view a monitor or watch HD movies.[/LIST] I am all for high resolution monitors for the masses if they don't compromise on anything else :P If its a trade off between the screen real estate and "super high resolutions", I would prefer more screen real estate. Frankly, I would love to see a 23" 16:9 1080p IPS "for the masses" as soon as possible. God, I so wish there was one so that I won't even have to make this review. Your powerful graphic card won't be powerful long enough as is the current trend with GPU hardware. Your monitor will outlive your GPU. Why not buy something which would serve you better for the long term? Good for you! :) My only aim is to help those who are in need of a new monitor. You can buy what you want and justify your purchases later :ohyeah: I am just finding justifications for a monitor I am yet to buy. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Need Buying Help?
Gadgets & Consumer Electronics Buying Advice
Mid-range LCDs demystified
Top
Bottom