Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Need Buying Help?
Gadgets & Consumer Electronics Buying Advice
Mid-range LCDs demystified
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elvesbane" data-source="post: 673212" data-attributes="member: 20606"><p>From Review, page 6...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why does everyone keep saying this?! The DPI on a 21.5" 1080p panel is just (approximately) 102! The human eye is capable of viewing detail to around 300 DPI. I believe that many independent tests have proved the same.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html" target="_blank">Clarkvision</a> - 530 DPI at 20 inches. (A very good read)</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixels_per_inch" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a> - 300 DPI (distance not mentioned)</p><p></p><p>Stop bashing lower size monitors for higher resolution!! As long as people have graphics cards good enough to pump out the required pixels, the greater density these monitors provide IS A GOOD THING.</p><p></p><p>Does everyone actually believe that resolutions won't ever go above 1080p?! After all desk sizes aren't gonna get much bigger, and most normal humans won't wanna use more than a 30 incher for a computer screen... so the super high resolutions (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_display_standard" target="_blank">beyond 2560x1600</a>) will eventually arrive on the high end displays and then filter down to the "for-the-masses" eventually.</p><p></p><p>In short, if you have a powerful graphics card, there is no reason NOT TO BUY a cheap higher resolution alternative like the BenQ E2200HD. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>From SenthilAnandh's reply to thirumalkumaran...</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is the exact sort of thing I don't understand!!</p><p></p><p>What do you mean by 'meant' for? Who decides these things?!</p><p></p><p>I'm using a E2200HD right now - and sitting at the same location as I used to for my old 17" (1280x1024). Other than a sharper, and overall (far) better picture, I don't see any shortfalls whatsoever!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elvesbane, post: 673212, member: 20606"] From Review, page 6... Why does everyone keep saying this?! The DPI on a 21.5" 1080p panel is just (approximately) 102! The human eye is capable of viewing detail to around 300 DPI. I believe that many independent tests have proved the same. [URL="http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html"]Clarkvision[/URL] - 530 DPI at 20 inches. (A very good read) [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixels_per_inch"]Wikipedia[/URL] - 300 DPI (distance not mentioned) Stop bashing lower size monitors for higher resolution!! As long as people have graphics cards good enough to pump out the required pixels, the greater density these monitors provide IS A GOOD THING. Does everyone actually believe that resolutions won't ever go above 1080p?! After all desk sizes aren't gonna get much bigger, and most normal humans won't wanna use more than a 30 incher for a computer screen... so the super high resolutions ([URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_display_standard"]beyond 2560x1600[/URL]) will eventually arrive on the high end displays and then filter down to the "for-the-masses" eventually. In short, if you have a powerful graphics card, there is no reason NOT TO BUY a cheap higher resolution alternative like the BenQ E2200HD. :D From SenthilAnandh's reply to thirumalkumaran... This is the exact sort of thing I don't understand!! What do you mean by 'meant' for? Who decides these things?! I'm using a E2200HD right now - and sitting at the same location as I used to for my old 17" (1280x1024). Other than a sharper, and overall (far) better picture, I don't see any shortfalls whatsoever!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Need Buying Help?
Gadgets & Consumer Electronics Buying Advice
Mid-range LCDs demystified
Top
Bottom