These labels are dehumanizing, even if true in some cases, and even then, should be used with sensitivity. A person may be misinformed, or ignorant, but still, labels are not helpful and downright arrogant. Also, there is an element of ad-hominem attacks in labels, which is not needed for anyone with reason and evidence on their side. And if it is too much trouble, you are free to not respond instead of going personal.There's no point in engaging with antivaxxers, climate change deniers, right-wingers etc.
You still have the right to block anyone and everyone including me but pretending that anyone talking about the potential for risks of vaccines in the face of withdrawals of vaccines by large manufacturers, or potential for complex adaptive systems (climate) being poorly understood as yet by humans can definitely be heard out, and labelling them does not come out as particularly scientific or useful. If anything, it makes the battle lines stronger, and the debate shallow. Not taking sides in the debate above, but everyone can do better than labelling.
Last edited: