Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Technology
Consumer Electronics
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM vs. Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="main_trouble" data-source="post: 1316106" data-attributes="member: 16963"><p>He asked </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I replied to that.</p><p>You can buy a watch for Rs.100 or Rs. 200k.</p><p>If you just care about the time , then maybe a cheap casio would do.</p><p></p><p>However if build quality, performance and ergonomics is important to you , then you can gofor more expensive ones. Needless to say, a casio would show the same time as tag-heuer. </p><p></p><p>I say it again.</p><p>1.4 for is a better LENS as it has much better autofocus.</p><p>But as far as optical characteristics go 1.8 is better. It's even better than ALL canon L lenses which cost a BOMB. If you just care about the image quality, then 1.8 is as good as it gets(very close to the top lens from sigma). </p><p></p><p>DXO labs also show what we have been hearing for some time but we ignore it as fanboy noise. Pentax does give you the best image quality. </p><p>Sadly AFAIK no pentax authorised reseller in India..</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">I have a Canon 1000d with a kit lens and 50mm f/1.8 ( which I LOOOOOOVE).</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="main_trouble, post: 1316106, member: 16963"] He asked I replied to that. You can buy a watch for Rs.100 or Rs. 200k. If you just care about the time , then maybe a cheap casio would do. However if build quality, performance and ergonomics is important to you , then you can gofor more expensive ones. Needless to say, a casio would show the same time as tag-heuer. I say it again. 1.4 for is a better LENS as it has much better autofocus. But as far as optical characteristics go 1.8 is better. It's even better than ALL canon L lenses which cost a BOMB. If you just care about the image quality, then 1.8 is as good as it gets(very close to the top lens from sigma). DXO labs also show what we have been hearing for some time but we ignore it as fanboy noise. Pentax does give you the best image quality. Sadly AFAIK no pentax authorised reseller in India.. [SIZE="1"]I have a Canon 1000d with a kit lens and 50mm f/1.8 ( which I LOOOOOOVE).[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Technology
Consumer Electronics
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM vs. Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Top
Bottom