Please provide a source for all these accusations.
Source for this? Examples of this regularly happening?
Follow feminist reactions on false rape cases or just about any topic. Go through any feminist publications or videos for your proof. It should be quite easy since feminism has been quite vocal in its rhetoric.
There is a vocal feminist professor named Judy Haiven who speaks at feminist events. Have look at what she has to say and what she does to male students in her class and what she advises other feminists do. Try to have a look at what self proclaimed feminist professors have to say and what they do.
Try other out other vocal feminists like Anita Sarkeesian if you can manage to keep your sanity for long enough.
Here is also a insightful debate on "sexist" air conditioning at offices.
The general feminist consensus on a topic like false rape accusations for instance is that it is a myth to be ignored or even when its glaringly obvious with a specific case context, they argue that the accuser is still a victim using some upside down logic, The whole episode is to be ignored and forgotten because it doesn't fit their purpose. There are no male victims. Women cannot be sexist. Women should never be punished for making false allegations. Asking for a woman to be punished for making false rape allegations and destroying someone's life is worse than rape itself. No dearth of such gems
Why does someone need to write something like this in an article about false rape if feminism is about gender equality than about woman? Because that is the expectation.
As a feminist, I know I’m ‘supposed’ to be on the side of the women in this story. And believe me, I want to be. No victim deserves to be left behind. But the more I talk to these men, the more something about these stories sticks out to me.
I think you label it as such cause it makes it much easier for you to think less of feminism if you consider it a typical political movement. To be honest, any movement among humans to change the way society works will be political. But you don't mean it as such. You would love to reduce it to brain dead practices of religion, cause it helps you reject it completely with just anecdotes rather than serious thought or even having any idea about it.
As a matter of fact, I do think less of any "ism" and group mentality thing be it religion, patriotism or any thing else. Feminism just happens to be no exception to that. Human beings have the ability of independent thinking in-spite of living in a society with others. Every person can have their own ideology and opinions on various topics. Ideologies can have common ground with others, but it does not mean you need to group up with them. Even if it looks like 99.99% of your ideas match with someone else, your ideology is still yours and theirs is theirs. The problem with group-ism and labels associated with groups is that its the brain dead idiots that go self identify with groups and they often go with the flow and change their own behavior around the most vocal leader figures. You can see this phenomena quite well in US. There are many people who were known to be conservative republicans to others, but don't like being labeled as such now because Trumps idea of republicans is not matching with their own ideology. They give their own personal ideology more importance than the label. The brain dead idiots on the other hand, just change themselves and go with the flow for the new version and continue.
So yeah, I do differentiate between someone who is believes in equality of the sexes as their own ideology and someone who self identifies as a feminist. Which is why I asked, is it you just labeling someone as feminist or do they self identify as a feminist. You didn't answer which makes be think it may be the former.
Most level headed woman that I know with a fair take on gender equality would consider it an insult to be labeled a feminist.
