Graphic Cards Uncomfirmed AMD R9-390X & Nvidia GTX 960 Indian Pricing
- Thread starter Rickyk
- Start date
Wow I actually forgot to add that? 
Here you go -
http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/76869-upcoming-amd-r9-390x-fiji-geforce-gtx-960-details-leak/
Also these -
http://techreport.com/news/27343/geforce-gtx-960-appears-in-import-shipment-record
http://in.ign.com/india/70901/news/rumour-nvidia-gtx-960-priced-under-rs-16000
Here you go -
http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/76869-upcoming-amd-r9-390x-fiji-geforce-gtx-960-details-leak/
Also these -
http://techreport.com/news/27343/geforce-gtx-960-appears-in-import-shipment-record
http://in.ign.com/india/70901/news/rumour-nvidia-gtx-960-priced-under-rs-16000
bssunilreddy
Skilled
If Nvidia GTX 960 is between 16k-18k then 280x will be erased...
You could be right but personally, I think it will be launched next month in time for Christmas shopping...
A rumored "potential" glimpse at R9-380X/390X performance? Bolded the interesting bits.
Via Toms -
It seems someone has spun up the rumor mill, pushing out a nice 'n juicy graphics card rumor.
Aside from a heap of price drops, it's been relatively quiet in the GPU world the past few weeks. Today that changes, though, as the rumor mill has pumped out a new, fresh, juicy bit of information.
Some of you may be familiar with the Chiphell forums. Often, users there will post benchmarks of unreleased products, and surprisingly enough, they often manage to be curiously accurate. Now, user Junmiu posted some performance information of a "Captain Jack" graphics card, and while we have no idea what card that is, we can guess.
The rumor is that "Captain Jack" is either the R9 380X or the R9 390X, although for all intents and purposes, it doesn't matter. One thing is certain – this card is from AMD. The "Captain Jack" codename falls (sort of) right in line with past names from the company, which include Hawaii, Tahiti, and even Vesuvius.
When we reached out to AMD, a company representative told us that he has never heard of "Captain Jack" in this context. While this means that it's possible that the codename isn't accurate, the representative did not say anything about the performance numbers, so there may be a hint of truth to this.
The listed performance sits at 65.6 FPS, which is an average performance number of a handful of games. All were run at a 2560 x 1440 resolution. This is notably faster than a GTX 980, which scored 56.6 FPS across the selection of games. Captain Jack still used a little more power than its green competitor, consuming 197 W vs the GTX 980's 185, but at that number it's actually still more efficient.
Why doesn't it matter whether it's the 380X or the 390X? Well, the performance numbers are very promising, and if there is any truth to them, AMD appears to be drastically improving the efficiency of its cards.
This is, of course, just a rumor, and AMD denied that Captain Jack exists, so we're taking all of this with a grain of salt.
Bolded the interesting bits.Via Toms -
It seems someone has spun up the rumor mill, pushing out a nice 'n juicy graphics card rumor.
Aside from a heap of price drops, it's been relatively quiet in the GPU world the past few weeks. Today that changes, though, as the rumor mill has pumped out a new, fresh, juicy bit of information.
Some of you may be familiar with the Chiphell forums. Often, users there will post benchmarks of unreleased products, and surprisingly enough, they often manage to be curiously accurate. Now, user Junmiu posted some performance information of a "Captain Jack" graphics card, and while we have no idea what card that is, we can guess.
The rumor is that "Captain Jack" is either the R9 380X or the R9 390X, although for all intents and purposes, it doesn't matter. One thing is certain – this card is from AMD. The "Captain Jack" codename falls (sort of) right in line with past names from the company, which include Hawaii, Tahiti, and even Vesuvius.
When we reached out to AMD, a company representative told us that he has never heard of "Captain Jack" in this context. While this means that it's possible that the codename isn't accurate, the representative did not say anything about the performance numbers, so there may be a hint of truth to this.
The listed performance sits at 65.6 FPS, which is an average performance number of a handful of games. All were run at a 2560 x 1440 resolution. This is notably faster than a GTX 980, which scored 56.6 FPS across the selection of games. Captain Jack still used a little more power than its green competitor, consuming 197 W vs the GTX 980's 185, but at that number it's actually still more efficient.
Why doesn't it matter whether it's the 380X or the 390X? Well, the performance numbers are very promising, and if there is any truth to them, AMD appears to be drastically improving the efficiency of its cards.
This is, of course, just a rumor, and AMD denied that Captain Jack exists, so we're taking all of this with a grain of salt.
Last edited:
psyph3r
Skilled
I'm in the market for a new gpu and have been reading nothing but rumors for the past 3 months. 970 is a great vfm card but i'd like to wait it out for the mid-rangers to show up in Q1 2015.
Just until last week it was rumored that only the high-end (390x) will be the new Fiji XT and the others will be upgraded Hawaii and now this bullsh*t shows up beating the 980. People speculating it's the 380x since last month a pic of the shroud surfaced which had cut-outs for liquid cooling but now this graph shows consumption under 200w which really doesn't warrant liquid cooling. Plus how are they able to squeeze out so much performance over last year while being so efficient ? I hope this is proper next gen using stacked memory and 20nm lithography but right now we need to take all this with a plate full of salt and just wait it out.
I really hope this is the 380x though (team Red fanboy here), it'll be great value if priced like the 280x at launch (24-25k). Besides, Nvidia is still sitting on the GM200 trump card so this better not be the best that AMD has to offer.
Just until last week it was rumored that only the high-end (390x) will be the new Fiji XT and the others will be upgraded Hawaii and now this bullsh*t shows up beating the 980. People speculating it's the 380x since last month a pic of the shroud surfaced which had cut-outs for liquid cooling but now this graph shows consumption under 200w which really doesn't warrant liquid cooling. Plus how are they able to squeeze out so much performance over last year while being so efficient ? I hope this is proper next gen using stacked memory and 20nm lithography but right now we need to take all this with a plate full of salt and just wait it out.
I really hope this is the 380x though (team Red fanboy here
), it'll be great value if priced like the 280x at launch (24-25k). Besides, Nvidia is still sitting on the GM200 trump card so this better not be the best that AMD has to offer.
Crapmypants
Adept
The GTX 960 is scheduled to be announced Jan 2015 at CES.
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-960-gm206-maxwell/
The above source states that its a rumour but it makes sense since the gtx 960 was supposed to have been out a few months ago (on 20nm) in time for the holiday season.
Going by past experience, I expect it to be priced at 20k+
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-960-gm206-maxwell/
The above source states that its a rumour but it makes sense since the gtx 960 was supposed to have been out a few months ago (on 20nm) in time for the holiday season.
Going by past experience, I expect it to be priced at 20k+
cellar_door
Adept
Damn I was hoping 18k ish for the 960. Would be the perfect upgrade for me.
Crapmypants
Adept
Not really, assuming the 960 will outperform the 760 it replaces and retail for under 18k then it would be good value compared to an r9 280 (which retails for 18k+)
But i seriously doubt if prices are going to be under 18k especially since the 760 is still 15k+.
Also, i don't think they will have a 'ti' version for the 960.
They didn't have one for the 760 and if they did launch a 960'ti', it will still be slower than a 970, so not really worth the wait.
p.s. -22nd Jan is the day they announce it at CES. actual availability will probably start a month or two later so be sure to take that into account if your planning on getting one.
But i seriously doubt if prices are going to be under 18k especially since the 760 is still 15k+.
Also, i don't think they will have a 'ti' version for the 960.
They didn't have one for the 760 and if they did launch a 960'ti', it will still be slower than a 970, so not really worth the wait.
p.s. -22nd Jan is the day they announce it at CES. actual availability will probably start a month or two later so be sure to take that into account if your planning on getting one.
psyph3r
Skilled
^There's definitely going to be a Ti, infact three variants have been rumored to be coming out. This is the vanilla GM206, the other two will mostly be cut down GM204 chips. The bulk of the market lies between $200-$320, they won't leave that huge gap for AMD to conquer with their price cuts. Comparing older products and their prices in today's date is pointless too, no one will buy this if it's around 18k.
Yea 22nd is the paper launch, think it was already posted above. Not interested in getting this though, terrible specs.
Yea 22nd is the paper launch, think it was already posted above. Not interested in getting this though, terrible specs.
Last edited:
Crapmypants
Adept
I agree. It's just that prices are so skewed over here, more so for nvidia. There's no way the 960 will arrive here for less than 18k.
2 months back a dealer offered me a 560Ti for 13k. He spoke as if it was the deal of a lifetime.
psyph3r
Skilled
Wow 3yr old card for almost the launch price, i hope you laughed in his face. Hope people don't fall for stuff like this.
I'm just pissed because Nvidia isn't passing down some of these gains to the consumer, it's time the market got something bang-for-buck like the 8800gt back in the day.
They released the mid-rangers last year packaged as high end and now they pull this. This xxxx06 sku is usually reserved for lower mid-range like say the 750Ti and yet they've named it 960. I really hope AMD comes out guns blazing.
Crapmypants
Adept
http://wccftech.com/amd-nvidia-20nm-16nm-delayed/
The above source says to expect the radeon 300 series in feb-march and it also explains why product launches are delayed for both amd and nvidia. i.e. qualcomm etc. are using up all the new node capacity.
@psyph3r - I didn't laugh because i genuinely thought i misheard him. And amd will certainly come out guns blazing this year thanks to stacked memory.
The above source says to expect the radeon 300 series in feb-march and it also explains why product launches are delayed for both amd and nvidia. i.e. qualcomm etc. are using up all the new node capacity.
@psyph3r - I didn't laugh because i genuinely thought i misheard him. And amd will certainly come out guns blazing this year thanks to stacked memory.
Last edited: