1.Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
2 MSI 785gt-e65
3. Biostar TA790GX A3
Which would be better from the above ?
my processor is AMD X4 620 and GPU is: Palit/Powercolor 4850GT 1GB DDRIII
Please advise: Asus M4A785TD-V EVO (micro atx board) OR Biostar TA790GX A3+
Started by pom99, Dec 01 2009 06:46 PM
21 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 01 December 2009 - 06:46 PM
#2
Posted 02 December 2009 - 01:52 AM
If you want a full ATX, CFX capable mobo, then Biostar is the way to go. Otherwise EVO model from Asus is good. There are some members using and satisfied with it. :)
And btw, you don't seem to have bought the graphic card yet. If it is so, rather than getting a 4850 1GB, get a 4870 512MB which costs almost the same. :)
And btw, you don't seem to have bought the graphic card yet. If it is so, rather than getting a 4850 1GB, get a 4870 512MB which costs almost the same. :)
#3
Posted 02 December 2009 - 03:18 AM
HD4850 1GB DDRIII costs ~7.5k. HD4870 512MB DDR5~8.6k. So there is 1k difference btw the two.
#4
Posted 02 December 2009 - 04:33 AM
even the onboard graphics r good on m4a785td -v evo
#5
Posted 02 December 2009 - 04:58 AM
Karthi007 said:
HD4850 1GB DDRIII costs ~7.5k. HD4870 512MB DDR5~8.6k. So there is 1k difference btw the two.
Ohh! Didn't know the price of 1GB has fallen that much. :ashamed: Still, for a 20/22" monitor, the extra 1k is worth every paisa unless you have restricted budget. :)
#6
Posted 02 December 2009 - 05:08 AM
sabby said:
Ohh! Didn't know the price of 1GB has fallen that much. :ashamed: Still, for a 20/22" monitor, the extra 1k is worth every paisa unless you have restricted budget. :)
I agree too .
ATI 4870 - 8.6k
#7
Posted 02 December 2009 - 05:42 AM
4870 512MB would be a better option. Out of the mobos try going full ATX rather than MaTX.
#8
Posted 02 December 2009 - 05:52 AM
The biostar board is a better bet since it has the SB750 which the 785G boards lack.
#9
Posted 02 December 2009 - 06:27 AM
+1 for biostar
lots of tweaking options and the side-port memory boosts the graphics.
lots of tweaking options and the side-port memory boosts the graphics.
#10
Posted 02 December 2009 - 06:38 AM
not only the price even the power consumption does matter
between hd 4850 and hd 4870
between hd 4850 and hd 4870
#11
Posted 03 March 2010 - 01:57 PM
If I buy an Asus M4A785TD-V Evo motherboard and 1600MHz RAM, then will it run at 1600 or do I have to overclock something? And do I have to OC the CPU or the RAM? Both?
#12
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:12 PM
Mate
Don't know about the particular asus board but my biostar 790GX A3+ Allows me to oc my Transcend DDR 1333 to 1600 just in one setting with out ocing any other things.
Don't know about the particular asus board but my biostar 790GX A3+ Allows me to oc my Transcend DDR 1333 to 1600 just in one setting with out ocing any other things.
#13
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:13 PM
dmudgal said:
even the onboard graphics r good on m4a785td -v evo
HD 3300 is anyday better than HD 4200, though the former is a DX 10 only GPU and latter is 10.1.
btw, i would have gone with the Biostar 790G3.
I see many drawbacks on the Asus 785 EVO. It has less number of temp sensors and 3 pin fan connectors on the mobo. Moreover i personally finds biostar mobos better overclockers.
#14
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:45 PM
tosh79 said:
Mate
Don't know about the particular asus board but my biostar 790GX A3+ Allows me to oc my Transcend DDR 1333 to 1600 just in one setting with out ocing any other things.
Don't know about the particular asus board but my biostar 790GX A3+ Allows me to oc my Transcend DDR 1333 to 1600 just in one setting with out ocing any other things.
Quote
btw, i would have gone with the Biostar 790G3.
I see many drawbacks on the Asus 785 EVO. It has less number of temp sensors and 3 pin fan connectors on the mobo. Moreover i personally finds biostar mobos better overclockers.
I see many drawbacks on the Asus 785 EVO. It has less number of temp sensors and 3 pin fan connectors on the mobo. Moreover i personally finds biostar mobos better overclockers.
Does Biostar have any Mobo with SB710 or SB750 or SB850 in full ATX?
I want a mobo to unlock my Phenom II 55 5BE and wanted to go Biostar. But all I find are mini/micro ATX and I'm looking for a full ATX for a massive cooler and more expansion options.
#15
Posted 03 March 2010 - 03:32 PM
ShahJahan said:
If I buy an Asus M4A785TD-V Evo motherboard and 1600MHz RAM, then will it run at 1600 or do I have to overclock something? And do I have to OC the CPU or the RAM? Both?
ALso, the MOBO is a FULL ATX and lemme tell u, if u r any bit pro-environment, u'd get this mobo. The bundled software is sleek, and just right for "bachao trees" ppl like me.:clap:
#16
Posted 03 March 2010 - 03:36 PM
Biostar 790GX A3+ is an ATX board with SB 750.
#17
Posted 04 March 2010 - 03:26 AM
dOm1naTOr said:
HD 3300 is anyday better than HD 4200, though the former is a DX 10 only GPU and latter is 10.1.
Then how come, most of the review sites recommend 785G over 790gx when it comes to IGP performance?
dOm1naTOr said:
I see many drawbacks on the Asus 785 EVO. It has less number of temp sensors and 3 pin fan connectors on the mobo. Moreover i personally finds biostar mobos better overclockers.
Also, see some of the reviews of A3+.
The TA790GX A3+ is a perfectly decent motherboard that will be fine for a basic home PC. However, its performance is sub par so we feel there are better alternatives.
Source:Trusted Reviews
Also, for this particular MB, oc is not that great as per other reviews. You can google it.
#18
Posted 04 March 2010 - 03:35 AM
I am wondering as to why no one here has mentioned the MSI G65. Its a better board than the other two, any day.
#19
Posted 04 March 2010 - 10:46 AM
Vasishta.Sushant said:
I am wondering as to why no one here has mentioned the MSI G65. Its a better board than the other two, any day.
G65 version available in India looks to be the mATX form factor - 785GM-E65. This board is on par with the Asus, if not better. As per review available, the Asus board is slightly better at OC and supports DDR-1600 w/o any hiccups.
#20
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:07 AM
I am stuck in the same boat with either ASUS EVO 785 ATX or AsRock 785 ATX
Also now after reading this thread i am open for a 790G Biostar, although one of the 790 ATX boards from MSI retailing at 9.5k has not good reviews w.r.t to OC
I have the following doubts for a DD3 based setup
1) If I choose 785 chipset should i have a x8 +x8 + x4 (provided by ASRock - has excellent reviews for OC/VFM(5.8k)) or x16 + x4 (provided by ASUS). I am looking for the best ATX 785. Does the x8 impact gaming performance, considering i wd add a 5870 later when the prices come around 15k)
2) Should I have USB3 onboard or have a USB 3.0 compatible board, I found a variant of Asus which supports USB 3.0 thru PCI xpress (ASUS M4A785TD-V EVO/U3S6) does this mean that the existing board dont?
I wd be getting a Phenom II 555 for the board..
Please help!!
Also now after reading this thread i am open for a 790G Biostar, although one of the 790 ATX boards from MSI retailing at 9.5k has not good reviews w.r.t to OC
I have the following doubts for a DD3 based setup
1) If I choose 785 chipset should i have a x8 +x8 + x4 (provided by ASRock - has excellent reviews for OC/VFM(5.8k)) or x16 + x4 (provided by ASUS). I am looking for the best ATX 785. Does the x8 impact gaming performance, considering i wd add a 5870 later when the prices come around 15k)
2) Should I have USB3 onboard or have a USB 3.0 compatible board, I found a variant of Asus which supports USB 3.0 thru PCI xpress (ASUS M4A785TD-V EVO/U3S6) does this mean that the existing board dont?
I wd be getting a Phenom II 555 for the board..
Please help!!
Sign In
Create Account
Back to top









