19 replies to this topic

[SidhuScorpion]

Read these scores, 7 games, ATi won in 6 w/ huge margin, Nvidia in 1, only 106% gain too -

16x AF, 4x AA

Age of Conan Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 39.1FPS ---- 123% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.9FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 36FPS --- 120% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 30.2FPS

Call of Duty World at War Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 60.8FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 59.8FPS
TIED less than 1FPS differance

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 50.4FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 59.1FPS --- 116% faster

Crysis Warhead Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 30.8FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.1FPS
TIED less than 1FPS differance

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 26.3FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 27FPS
TIED less than 1FPS differance

Fallout 3 Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 52.8FPS -- 123% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 42.9FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 49.3FPS --- 122% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 40.5FPS

FarCry 2 Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 31.3FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 33.4FPS --- 106% faster

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 29.2FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.7FPS --- 107% faster

Left 4 Dead Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 86.5FPS --- 124% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 70.3FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 73.2FPS --- 113% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 64.5FPS

Race Driver GRID Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 83.1FPS --- 139% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 59.9FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 72.8FPS --- 127% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 57.7FPS

U will wonder what changed ? We have seen so many GTX 260 Core 216 reviews @ Christmas time, were they corrupted ? Here Anandtech compared $ 150 GPU against $ 215 GTX 260.

So many possibilities,

1. Anandtech favours ATI ?
2. December reviews were corrupted, Nvidia influenced.
3. Nothing changed, I m not reading properly :ashamed:

:)

[chiron]

I think you got your math a bit wrong there dude.

[damn]

I always thought drivers influenced things a lot and nVIDIA were always more prompt than ATi in that regard.
nVIDIA started scoring big after they launched drivers for Far Cry.

[Vandal]

Which school did you attend?? :rofl:

ek duni do chaar :rofl:

More ATi fanboi beetches...

[SidhuScorpion]

OMG what I did ? :S :ashamed: :rofl:

[stalker]

@sidhu..

The ATI cards are not 1xx% faster.. they score 1xx% as much as the nvidia cards.
Therefore, the ATI cards are xx% faster :) than the nvidia cards

[muzux2]

lol sidhu, you are weak in maths..

[Gurpartap Singh]

^^ lol pwned :P :lol:

[Gannu]

SidhuPunjab said:

Read these scores, 7 games, ATi won in 6 w/ huge margin, Nvidia in 1, only 106% gain too -

16x AF, 4x AA

Age of Conan Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 39.1FPS ---- 123% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.9FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 36FPS --- 120% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 30.2FPS

Call of Duty World at War Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 60.8FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 59.8FPS
TIED less than 1FPS differance

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 50.4FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 59.1FPS --- 116% faster wtf!! :P

Crysis Warhead Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 30.8FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.1FPS
TIED less than 1FPS differance

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 26.3FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 27FPS
TIED less than 1FPS differance

Fallout 3 Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 52.8FPS -- 123% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 42.9FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 49.3FPS --- 122% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 40.5FPS

FarCry 2 Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 31.3FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 33.4FPS --- 106% faster wtf!! :P

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 29.2FPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.7FPS --- 107% faster wtf!! :P

Left 4 Dead Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 86.5FPS --- 124% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 70.3FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 73.2FPS --- 113% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 64.5FPS

Race Driver GRID Performance

1680x1050
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 83.1FPS --- 139% faster wtf!! :P
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 59.9FPS

1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 72.8FPS --- 127% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 57.7FPS

U will wonder what changed ? We have seen so many GTX 260 Core 216 reviews @ Christmas time, were they corrupted ? Here Anandtech compared $ 150 GPU against $ 215 GTX 260.

So many possibilities,

1. Anandtech favours ATI ?
2. December reviews were corrupted, Nvidia influenced.
3. Nothing changed, I m not reading properly :ashamed:

4. No problems with the scores. I misinterpreted the math there. :P

:)

Lol sidhu, go to school now. Its not late, yet! :chair:

ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB 39.1FPS ---- 123% faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 31.9FPS

(39.1 - 31.9)/31.9 = .2257 = 22.57% faster not 123%. :P

[Arun.P]

^ but he is 20-21 year old how can he attend school at adult age hood :|

i guess he is jobless and too much in computer games

[RoBoGhOsT]

Arun.P said:

^ but he is 20-21 year old how can he attend school at adult age hood :|

i guess he is jobless and too much in computer games

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[stalker]

Arun.P said:

^ but he is 20-21 year old how can he attend school at adult age hood :|

i guess he is jobless and too much in computer games

Killed!! :lol:

[SidhuScorpion]

:ashamed: :rofl: I m lazy, searched Google Online coversion, opened this. and entered fields. ADSL link light dropping eveery min here :S

[mallik]

OT, but that is the biggest pawnage I have seen on this forum !
Sidhu pra ye kaise ho gaya !

[SidhuScorpion]

I had feeling, something is not right, thats why 3rd option in poll, I was not cocksure, my nightmare turned to reallity :crash:

[vicente]

Anandtech does not favor any side, their benchies are fine and opinion is unbiased.
But I get the feeling the authors would love to have Ati and AMD ahead of nvidia and Intel ... more like supporting the underdog.

[gamervivek]

1. Anandtech favours ATI ?

agree.ati favoring games and i think 8xAA killed it for gtx260.

[Switch]

Actually biggest pwnage was the M$ calculater thread by backtoexistence. That was legendary...

[Vandal]

Everyone likes an underdog.

[arjun123]

According to these tests GTX 250 beats 260(216sp) in most tests and I thought GTX 250 was slightly inferior to GTX 260(even 192sp)?

LOL @ even 4850 scoring higher than GTX 260 in some tests. :D