Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Technology
Consumer Electronics
Dispelling Inverter advertising myths
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy_Eddy" data-source="post: 1945527" data-attributes="member: 167"><p><s>Firstly you have not been blocked from posting in the thread - there is no such option in Xenforo. You are free to confirm with the Admins. I have even shifted the posts to the thread.</s></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000">Edit: Sorry about this, another member mentions there is an issue posting in the thread as well. Will check with the admins and see whats wrong.</span></p><p></p><p>To be clear we are not talking about your room or real life scenarios. You are correct and I will address this next. Right now we are ONLY talking about the unrealistic scenario Sharp has proposed in the Image above ^^. In fact the scenario doesn't let an Inverter step down its compressor and perform as it should, which is what I want to point out.</p><p></p><p>With all your blubbering you totally missed the error in Sharp's scenario. <strong>Duty Cycle</strong>. It means how long the compressor stays on. A non inverter always consumes 1.8KW <strong>when the compressor is operational</strong>. And as you know a non-inverter's compressor turns on and off based on the heatload which is where the losses stem from. If you see the calcs in the image above, they claim the non-inverter compressor is operating at a consistent 1.8KW per hour which means <strong>the compressor is never switching off</strong> and the duty cycle is 100% and the room is a consistent 5.2KW heatload.</p><p>Now you can have an Inverter or a coanda effect or whatever, but the basic law of the universe is power in = power out. If your heatload demands ~5.2KW, as per the Sharp specs it will consume 1.44KW to supply it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy_Eddy, post: 1945527, member: 167"] [S]Firstly you have not been blocked from posting in the thread - there is no such option in Xenforo. You are free to confirm with the Admins. I have even shifted the posts to the thread.[/S] [COLOR=#ff0000]Edit: Sorry about this, another member mentions there is an issue posting in the thread as well. Will check with the admins and see whats wrong.[/COLOR] To be clear we are not talking about your room or real life scenarios. You are correct and I will address this next. Right now we are ONLY talking about the unrealistic scenario Sharp has proposed in the Image above ^^. In fact the scenario doesn't let an Inverter step down its compressor and perform as it should, which is what I want to point out. With all your blubbering you totally missed the error in Sharp's scenario. [B]Duty Cycle[/B]. It means how long the compressor stays on. A non inverter always consumes 1.8KW [B]when the compressor is operational[/B]. And as you know a non-inverter's compressor turns on and off based on the heatload which is where the losses stem from. If you see the calcs in the image above, they claim the non-inverter compressor is operating at a consistent 1.8KW per hour which means [B]the compressor is never switching off[/B] and the duty cycle is 100% and the room is a consistent 5.2KW heatload. Now you can have an Inverter or a coanda effect or whatever, but the basic law of the universe is power in = power out. If your heatload demands ~5.2KW, as per the Sharp specs it will consume 1.44KW to supply it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Technology
Consumer Electronics
Dispelling Inverter advertising myths
Top
Bottom