TechEnclave
Register Now

Registration is free.
Join us today.

HD4850 review

This is a discussion on HD4850 review within the Reviews and Previews forums, part of the TechEnclave Gateway category; HD4850 by Sapphire...

TechEnclave > TechEnclave Gateway > Reviews and Previews


Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools Display Modes
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->HD4850 review<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
HD4850 review
Published by fcry64
8 Aug 08
Contents
Default Page 1

HD4850 by Sapphire






4800 series are the latest offering by Amd-Ati. The 4850 along with their current flagship product the 4870 was an highly anticipated graphics card solution, knowing that it would be priced aggressively….and it is now, infact making it the best bang for buck enthusiast gpu solution available.


I have two cards for this review to compare w/ - a 4850 and a 8800GTS 512; which is almost equal in performance to the 9800GTX. Infact, clock per clock, the 8800GTS 512 wins the lead…but that’s not important here.


4850 is at a less than 200$ price point now. It was first rumored to to have 480 shader processors, the parallel processing units that make up the core’s processing power. But it is now known that such wasn’t the case. The shader processors were maybe rumored like that by ati themselves, to present to their competitors an unexpected surprise later on. While nvidia earned much by their RnD products which did work out great, Ati wasn’t having a great time around…but they might have been like the duck that seems unflattered on the water surface floating on it, but does a great deal paddling all the time…its little feet responsible for the thrust and turns it desires.

In my opinion, Nvidia made a mistake by choosing to make the ‘fastest single gpu solution around’ w/o taking into account ATLEAST how fast its going to be, lets not talk about those specific target die size records breaks and totally ignore power consumption(we welcome higher power consumptions and prefer it over lower). Had been the ati offering not as it is now, i.e., 480SP then the gtx 280 would have shone somewhat(somewhat because knowing enthusiasts were tired of g80 core shrinks and optimizations and releases as a card) as a new card, even though performance differences over the previous generations is not at all reasonable(see the jump from 7900gtx to 8800gtx), even if there are some major architectural differences over the g80 and the gt200 or the d10-u. now the fastest solutions price equaled to twice the price of the something-near-to-the fastest solution, the 4870. so they got into a situation…their perspective followed for sometime now is being paid of.


4850/4870 use the same rv770 core, the difference lies in clocks and in the memory architectures they are equipped with.

<< <    Next Page: 4850 Specs (Page 1 of 26 )    >  >>

Article Tools
Show Printable Version  Email this Page 


  #1  
By fcry64 on 8 Aug 08, 08:43 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

will edit the intro part later..it sucks i know..don't fall for it though
Reply With Quote
  #2  
By sTALKEr on 8 Aug 08, 08:58 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

zomg!! that shit is massive dood!!

great work...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
By muzux2 on 8 Aug 08, 09:30 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

good effort..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
By Gurpartap Singh on 8 Aug 08, 10:46 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

Great extensive work and write up Repped

PS: You need to improve excel skills j/k
Last edited by Gurpartap Singh : 8 Aug 08 at 10:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
By fcry64 on 8 Aug 08, 11:59 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

thanks guys...i need to improve the excel skills...i haven't used it except for this review..btw that excel pic needs to be edited...i slipped the transisters to 666 for 4850...just saw it
Reply With Quote
  #6  
By sourcewop on 9 Aug 08, 12:23 AM
Default Re: HD4850 review

Great huge review
Reply With Quote
  #7  
By Saiyan on 9 Aug 08, 01:29 AM
Default Re: HD4850 review

Nice review Neat pics as well ...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
By roadrippersid on 11 Aug 08, 02:50 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

Nice review wit pics took a helluva of time to write 26 pages...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
By Freaky on 11 Aug 08, 03:05 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

Thorough review What did you use to test the stability of the OC for the 4850 ? No one's got that high clocks without the pencil mod at the least.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
By nukeu666 on 11 Aug 08, 03:27 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

lots of details
Reply With Quote
  #11  
By ?dOuBtFiRe? on 11 Aug 08, 06:55 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

Nice one though ....But pricey for the games i play

Satisfied is not the word in the "World of Graphics Card"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
By fcry64 on 11 Aug 08, 10:21 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

View Post
Originally Posted by Freaky
Thorough review What did you use to test the stability of the OC for the 4850 ? No one's got that high clocks without the pencil mod at the least.
I used crysis, ran all the 3 benches(4 times each as default) for stability testing.

no pencil mod, just fan@100% is fantastic. those who own one - do try that. as i mentioned in the pros part =- the build quality as well as the performance of the cooling materials used doesn't suck

@?dOuBtFiRe? - i haven't used that word in the whole review
Reply With Quote
  #13  
By fcry64 on 11 Aug 08, 10:32 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

but 100 fan sucks...its loudest around...like a high rpm table fan
Reply With Quote
  #14  
By fcry64 on 11 Aug 08, 11:13 PM
Default Re: HD4850 review

it would be nice to have a 4850 oc thread around .. also it will help people know what solder/pencil can do for overclocking and maybe how too.. if someone takes the time...i may do that..later perhaps..not sure about messin though
Reply With Quote
Comment


Article Tools
Display Modes


Welcome, Unregistered.

  
Search
Advertisement


From FunEnclave
Quick Navigation

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Style by Safin, exclusive for TechEnclave
Copyright ©2005 - 2008 TechEnclave.com, All Rights Reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0