- 5 Dec 09 12:16 AM #1is Online HIM
Join Date: Jan 2009Location: West DelhiAge: 22Posts: 177
hey guyz,
i have a Sammy S2333sw+ (50000:1 walla). The problem is thta, when i look if from right in front its ok ,, when i look it from above ( like looking down on monitor ,, while standing up ) there is less black so am able to observer or see more things.
I have a low bed ,,, almost touching the ground. When i look up at the monitor from my bed i c almost black. Half of teh things are black and am able to observe almost nuthin.
IS IT JUST ME OR EVERYONE?? OR JUST SECIFIC TO SAMMY LCD MONITORS - 5 Dec 09 12:51 AM #2
i suppose you are new to the viewing angle aspect of an LCD panel.
contrast ratio will drop in terms of visibility as viewing angle increases.
you will get best picture when the LCD is perceived from 90 degrees..that is from center and perpendicular to the surface of the panel.Last edited by madnav; 5 Dec 09 at 12:55 AM.
- 5 Dec 09 02:01 AM #3is Online HIM
Join Date: Jan 2009Location: West DelhiAge: 22Posts: 177
thnx man !! appreciate it !!!
yup .. am fckd ! - 5 Dec 09 08:06 AM #4
This is MOST Normal for any TN Panel..whatever Brand!!!
does NOT happens to expensive ones with IPS/E-IPS/MVA/PVA/etc..etc Panels! - 5 Dec 09 09:10 AM #5
Yes I have a one samsung recently bought for my kids computer & its a cheap TN panel hence the viewing angle suffers, for my computer I use MVA (Lenovo LCD) & that does not do this, I can view the image without any darkening of screen on my MVA panel.
MVA panel was bought 3 yrs ago 3 times the cost of samsung present cost so u know what u pay is what u get.
My advice is that when buying LCD don't go for contrast ratios & viewing angle specifications, they are all fudged figures & advertised, like real watts vs pmpo watts, instead ask for a demo of LCD tahts what I did when I bought lenovo lcd 3 yrs back.Last edited by ranjan2001; 5 Dec 09 at 09:15 AM.
- 5 Dec 09 10:31 AM #6
No the viewing angle really sucks on cheaper TN LCD's. Coming from CRT's I find this quite unacceptable especially since I do photography and some designing too. IPS panels are the way to go, expensive but worth it. However their response time isn't as fast as TN panels are but aren't that slow to have ghosting either.
- 5 Dec 09 10:49 AM #7
TN panels achieve faster response time by sacrificing the viewing angle both TN/MVA are meant for different usage.
General advice
If you game then u need TN panels & should not complain about viewing angles as u will always be in front of ur lcd while gaming.
If u r in photography & graphic designing u will never need faster response time, u will need a lcd which is TRUE 8 bit panel & its gamma curve is linear or smooth from dark to light(should not have spiking in the gamma curve) TN panels cannot be accurately color calibrated due to non linear gamma curve which they have. - 5 Dec 09 12:17 PM #8is Offline Hyperactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009Age: 20Posts: 52
Have a 2033 sammy and its the same . it happens in all the cheap lcds i suppose.
- 5 Dec 09 01:01 PM #9
i guess u r new to LCD panels.....
it hapens with all.... - 5 Dec 09 02:24 PM #10is Online HIM
Join Date: Jan 2009Location: West DelhiAge: 22Posts: 177
thnx guyz !! now i knw !! my next LCD that i will buy after 10-12 years ,, will make sure i dont buy cheap panels !!! lolz !!
thnx ! - 5 Dec 09 09:35 PM #11
It doe snot happen with all LCD, it only will happen with cheaper TN panels, IPS panels can be viewed from 150° without darkening at all.
This is a manufacturing process limitation, the process for TN panels differ a lot from IPs panels bcoz they serve different purposes.
You should have checked before u bought the LCD & you are still being ignorant, LCD monitors dont have a 10-12 yrs life cycle.
Max 5-6 yrs unless u use it 1 hr a day.
My lenovo is used 12 hrs a day & it will be completing its 3 yrs next February 10th I am alreday planning my next lcd & it will be IPS panel this time.Last edited by ranjan2001; 5 Dec 09 at 09:38 PM. Reason: Post merged automatically to prevent bumping.
- 6 Dec 09 11:49 AM #12
I've to balance between gaming and photography, so it's a tough call for me. I still use my CRT monitor as honestly CRT technology is PERFECT compared to LCD viewing angles and response time issues.
I still find the viewing angle nonsense quite unacceptable, as when I watch movies I like to relax and watch and this is a problem with cheap TN models. A slight shift and there is a noticeable colour/contrast change. Very annoying! - 6 Dec 09 12:08 PM #13
- 6 Dec 09 01:00 PM #14
^ The backlight is the weak link. Although its not that bad. They claim to have a life-span of 50~60,000 hours. Though the numbers might probably be lower in real-life conditions.. plus the fact that the backlight dims over time.
True. But the problem is there aren't any CRTs with a large enough size being made anymore. - 15 Dec 09 03:54 PM #15
Sigh..yeah. 19" CRT's you still get, some viewsonic ones can do Full HD 1920X 1200 res, but what's the bloody point in that without widescreen. Plus LCD's are better for the eyes too!
Did you know that...there were limited widescreen CRT's taken out in the US! Amazon.com: Sony GDM-FW900 Flat Widescreen 24" FD Trinitron CRT Monitor: Computer & Accessories


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

, Is there any LCD with good life cycle... still after using it 9-12 hrs a day? 

