Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Gaurish is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Jaipur
    Posts
    3,290
    A need for speed: the path to a faster loading sequence

    Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:48 AM

    Posted by Wiltse Carpenter, Tech Lead, Gmail Performance



    Great performance has always been an obsession at Google and it's something that we think about and work on everyday. We want Gmail to be really fast, and we keep working on ways to make it faster. Gmail's architecture eliminates many of the delays in reading mail by employing techniques like prefetching, but recently we decided to take a close look at some other key parts of Gmail to see if we could speed things up.


    Full post via Official Google Blog



    Lot of tech info given but they are trying to say that Gmail is been more lighter & therefore faster





    But did you guys notice the change

    Honestly, i didn't

    what about you guys?

  2. #2
    Ashish.K is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    598
    Nor did i noticed any changes, may be we are too use to of the fast mails



    I do noticed the increased mailbox size i.e > 6 GB i assume

  3. #3
    whatsinaname is offline Privileged Users
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    I've personally found gmail to be really really fast on firefox 3 beta. (I switched from Opera recently). Don't know if I'll notice any difference.

  4. #4
    Renegade's Avatar
    Renegade is offline The Outlaw
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pune
    Posts
    4,641
    ask someone who has been accessing internet on gprs for the last 45 days. I can say that it loads in one go now since a few days. Earlier I had to refresh it several times before it used to load and that too in html mode.



    Could be that or could be my gprs has improved.

  5. #5
    Dinesh_Malhotra is offline Privileged Users
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,099
    i am gettin constant errors onle while openin gmail
    No Advertising in Siggie. Please follow rules.

  6. #6
    Blugene is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    488
    I could notice the change in faster loading times...earlier when my dnlds are in full swing it used to take a lot of time to load...but tonight it was working very fast even when downloads were running...plus in our office also i always used to get the HTML version..but since this morning it was loading nicely.



    So definitely, there has been substantial improvements in gmail i'd say.

  7. #7
    Ashish.K is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    598
    A couple of the things they did were:



    * Spriting - combining all the small graphics into a single image and using CSS background image placement to split out the individual icons.

    * Request pooling - Combining together seperate XHR requests into a single large request and then parsing out the results.

    * Cacheing - making more of the resource requests cacheable by the browser (JavaScript, CSS etc). That way when the user reloads the page, it doesn’t need to download the same resources over and over.



    To help them with this task they used proxy trace tools like Fiddler, WireShark, and HTTPWatch. I think Firebug would have been a good option here too. Other things they could have done (and may have) are:



    * GZip compression - compressing all your static resources with ZIP making them much smaller to transmit. This works on all major browsers these days.

    * Conbining JS and CSS resources - By concatenating all your JavaScript and CSS resources into one, you reduce the number of requests needed and really speed up your site.


    Source of the information

  8. #8
    Vij
    Vij is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,658
    Interesting... So its faster now.

    Btw whats "more faster"...




    I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code

  9. #9
    RiO
    RiO is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,663
    The whole world is on dope.

  10. #10
    whatsinaname is offline Privileged Users
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by vij
    Interesting... So its faster now.

    Btw whats "more faster"...


    It just means that now Gmail's speed goes up to *drumroll* 11.

  11. #11
    Rahul++'s Avatar
    Rahul++ is offline (Rahulrulez)
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    /public_html
    Posts
    2,694
    Blog Entries
    2
    Galleries
    1
    i didn't feel any booster but slightly...
    I (Rahulrulez) ain't rule no more, I'm Rahul++ now

    :: Intel Core i5 2500k @ Stock (Need Cooler), Asus P8P67, MSI N560GTX-Ti TF2 OC Edition, G.Skill RipJaws 2x4GB 1600MHz, Seasonic SII 620W PSU ::

  12. #12
    idea is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    339
    it is faster...

  13. #13
    RiO
    RiO is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,663
    Quote Originally Posted by Rahulrulez
    i didn't feel any booster but slightly...
    That's the drugs slowly kicking in...

  14. #14
    Vandal is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,253
    Didn't notice. And gmail has been progressively getting slower the past couple of years...



    ^^ More faster = faster. There's no such thing as "more faster"

  15. #15
    KingKrool is offline Privileged Users
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,561
    Actually, everyone in the US seems to find it slower... I wonder whether their changes affect latency or throughput or both...
    Genesis of C C Faq Incompatibilities between ISO C and C++

    Every time I think I've hit bottom, somebody throws me a shovel.

    You're one of a kind. At least that's what the entire human race is hoping.

  16. #16
    Gaurish is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Jaipur
    Posts
    3,290
    I can see the Progress Bar, which is nice welcome Addition.

  17. #17
    Anish is offline Privileged Users
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Goa, India.
    Posts
    6,870
    Certainly quicker on the Plug2Surf modem on my notebook.



    I think they've optimised it for slower connections, so dialup/wireless/EDGe users will find it quick, not those on Broadband/Cable connections.



    @ Rio - Lol!

  18. #18
    The Sorcerer is offline Privileged Users
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,988
    Same here. I am getting way better loading with tata indicom's plug2surf.

  19. #19
    SharekhaN is offline Upgraded User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,882
    it is definitely much faster than before.
    I'm going to become rich and famous after I invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26-06-09, 05:22 PM
  2. faster GTX260 soon
    By hatter in forum Graphic Cards
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-09-08, 03:23 PM
  3. Boot XP Faster than ever
    By dj_faithless in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 21-06-08, 08:26 PM
  4. which'd be faster??
    By Vandal in forum PC Peripherals
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21-01-06, 07:24 PM
  5. DivX® 6.1 codec - Up to 3x faster!
    By dipdude in forum Applications
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-12-05, 08:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 05:00 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2