PPPoA vs PPPoE and LLC vs VC-MUX

Discussion in 'Internet Talk' started by varkey, Feb 17, 2007.

  1. varkey
    Offline

    varkey Privileged Users

    What is the difference between PPPoA and PPPoE?? Also LLC and VC-MUX.

    Which combination is the best. Does it offer any speed advantages??
  2. varkey
    Offline

    varkey Privileged Users

    bump!!!!

    i noticed that after switching to PPPoA LLC the speed increased a bit. hourly downloads increased by abt 5MB.

    but PPPoA VC-MUX doesnt work with tata.

    can someone please explain it properly??
  3. thixkull
    Offline

    thixkull Upgraded User

    PPPOA or PPPoA, Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) over ATM, is a network protocol for encapsulating PPP frames in ATM AAL5. It is used mainly with cable modem, DSL and ADSL services.

    It offers standard PPP features such as authentication, encryption, and compression. If it is used as the connection encapsulation method on an ATM based network it can reduce overhead slightly (around 0.58%) in comparison to PPPoE. It also avoids the issues that PPPoE suffers from, related to having a MTU lower than that of standard Ethernet transmission protocols. It also supports (as does PPPoE) the encapsulation types: VC-MUX and LLC based.

    PPPoA is specified in RFC 2364.

    Virtual Circuit Multiplexing or VC-MUX is a form of network traffic control. It is used in situations where multiplexing is preferable to switching. Multiplexing is used when there's a need to transport multiple data streams over a single data link. VC-MUX is commonly used in conjunction with PPPoE and PPPoA. Which are used in various xDSL implementations.

    According to the IEEE 802 family of standards (Ethernet, WiFi, etc), in VC Multiplexing (VC-MUX), each ATM Virtual Circut (VC) carries PDUs of exactly one protocol type. When multiple protocols need to be transported, there is a separate VC for each.

    Advantages:

    * VC multiplexing tends to reduce fragmentation overhead (e.g., an IPV4 datagram containing a TCP control packet with neither IP nor TCP options exactly fits into a single cell).

    According to the IEEE 802 family of standards, Logical Link Control (LLC) is the upper sublayer of the OSI data link layer. The LLC is the same for the various physical media (such as Ethernet, token ring, and WLAN).

    The LLC sublayer is primarily concerned with:

    * Multiplexing protocols transmitted over the MAC layer (when transmitting) and demultiplexing them (when receiving).

    * Optionally providing flow control and detection and retransmission of dropped packets, if requested.

    The protocol used in IEEE 802 networks and in some non-IEEE 802 networks such as FDDI for LLC is specified by the IEEE 802.2 standard.

    Some non-IEEE 802 protocols can be thought of as being split into MAC and LLC layers. For example, while HDLC specifies both MAC functions (framing of packets) and LLC functions (protocol multiplexing, flow control, and detection and retransmission of dropped packets), some protocols such as Cisco HDLC can use HDLC-like packet framing and their own LLC protocol.

    PPPoE, Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet, is a network protocol for encapsulating PPP frames in Ethernet frames. It is used mainly with ADSL services. It offers standard PPP features such as authentication, encryption, and compression. Unfortunately it has an MTU lower than that of standard Ethernet which can sometimes cause problems with badly configured firewalls.

    PPPoE is a tunneling protocol which allows layering IP, or other protocols that run over PPP, over a connection between two Ethernet ports, but with the software features of a PPP link, so it is used to virtually "dial" to another Ethernet machine and make a point to point connection with it, which is then used to transport IP packets, based on the features of PPP.

    It allows the use of traditional PPP-based software to handle a connection which does not use a serial line, but a packet-oriented network like Ethernet, to provide a classical connection with login and password for Internet connection accounting. Also, the IP address on the other side of the link is only assigned when the PPPoE connection is open, allowing the dynamic reuse of IP addresses.

    PPPoE was developed by UUNET, Redback Networks, and RouterWare. The protocol is specified in RFC 2516.
  4. varkey
    Offline

    varkey Privileged Users

    so which one is better?? why is there a slight increase in speed when using PPPoA?
  5. leomax
    Offline

    leomax Privileged Users

    PPPoA uses ATM encapsulation,which has lower overhead than ethernet because most of these isp's use still use ATM bbones,which might be basically the reason u might get a bit more speed (although not substantial).

    PPPoE is in reality is PPPoEoA ,so additional overhead.

    Ill find few nice links for ya later

    PPPoE Vs PPPoA [Archive] - Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri

    Roxen Community: RFC 2684 Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5 (Standards Track).

    Another thing,its upto isp to provide which protocol (assuming ur router/cpe supports it)..
  6. rPOk
    Offline

    rPOk Upgraded User

    thx guys for the nice explanations...didn't have a clue about this before...
  7. Amol
    Offline

    Amol Privileged Users

    Yes..In short...PPOA is a little better than PPoE for several reasons. Firstly - because of lesser overhead in packets transmitted over the network.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
Internet Talk Scheduling PPPoE in XP Dec 24, 2008
Internet Talk HELP : PPPoe better than Bridge connection? Jul 6, 2006
Internet Talk Onboard Lan dead and problems with PPPoE Jun 2, 2006
Internet Talk Xp 64 pppoe download Dec 21, 2005
Internet Talk PPPOE for 64 bit XP Jun 22, 2005

Share This Page